高级搜索
    李思汉, 蔡晓光, 徐洪路, 冯加煜, 黄鑫, 景立平. RBT模式下模块式加筋土挡墙地震主动土压力分析[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2023, 31(4): 921-934. DOI: 10.16058/j.issn.1005-0930.2023.04.010
    引用本文: 李思汉, 蔡晓光, 徐洪路, 冯加煜, 黄鑫, 景立平. RBT模式下模块式加筋土挡墙地震主动土压力分析[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2023, 31(4): 921-934. DOI: 10.16058/j.issn.1005-0930.2023.04.010
    LI Sihan, CAI Xiaoguang, XU Honglu, FENG Jiayu, HUANG Xin, JING Liping. Seismic Active Earth Pressure Analysis of Modular-block Reinforced Soil Retaining Wall Under RBT Mode[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2023, 31(4): 921-934. DOI: 10.16058/j.issn.1005-0930.2023.04.010
    Citation: LI Sihan, CAI Xiaoguang, XU Honglu, FENG Jiayu, HUANG Xin, JING Liping. Seismic Active Earth Pressure Analysis of Modular-block Reinforced Soil Retaining Wall Under RBT Mode[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2023, 31(4): 921-934. DOI: 10.16058/j.issn.1005-0930.2023.04.010

    RBT模式下模块式加筋土挡墙地震主动土压力分析

    Seismic Active Earth Pressure Analysis of Modular-block Reinforced Soil Retaining Wall Under RBT Mode

    • 摘要: 为考虑加筋土挡墙位移模式对地震主动土压力的影响,利用力多边形方法和Winkler地基梁模型,推导了地震主动土压力计算方法.通过大型振动台试验对模块式加筋土挡墙的位移模式、动土压力增量分布及合力作用点位置、地震主动土压力分布及合力作用点位置进行了研究;归纳不同国家、行业的地震土压力计算方法,对比分析实测结果、该方法和规范方法的异同性.结果表明,墙面板顶部位移最大,位移模式为绕基底转动与平移耦合(RBT)模式,且以转动变形为主导;动土压力增量呈非线性分布,合力作用点位置随峰值加速度的增大而逐渐下降;地震主动土压力分布呈非线性,合力作用点位置在0.34~0.45墙体高度;对比规范方法、该方法和实测结果可知,计算数值略有不同,合力的整体分布趋势基本一致,该方法计算的合力作用点位置与实测结果趋势接近.

       

      Abstract: To consider the influence of displacement mode of reinforced soil retaining wall (RSRW) on seismic active earth pressure (SAEP),the calculation method of SAEP is deduced by using force polygon method and Winkler foundation beam model.The displacement mode of modular-block RSRW,the distribution of dynamic earth pressure increment and the position of resultant force point,the distribution of SAEP and the position of resultant force point are studied by large shaking table test.The calculation methods of seismic earth pressure in different countries and industries are summarized.The similarities and differences among the measured results,the proposed methods and the standard methods are compared and analyzed.The results show that the maximum displacement is at the top of the wall panel,and the displacement mode is rotation around the base and translation coupling (RBT) mode dominated by rotation deformation.The dynamic earth pressure increment is nonlinearly distributed,and the position of resultant force action point decreases with the increase of peak acceleration.The distribution of SAEP is nonlinear,and the joint action point is between 0.34~0.45 wall height.Comparing the standard method,the proposed method and the test data,the results show that the calculated values are slightly different,and the overall distribution trend of the resultant force is basically the same.The position of the resultant force action point calculated by the proposed method is close to the trend of the measured results.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回